Mountain View
biomedical and healthCAre Data Discovery Index Ecosystem
help Advanced Search
Title: Data from: Clinical study reports of randomised controlled trials: an exploratory review of previously confidential industry reports      
keywords:
MEDICAL ETHICS
MEDICAL JOURNALISM
INTERNAL MEDICINE
type:
Article
description:
Objective: To explore the structure and content of a non-random sample of clinical study reports (CSRs) to guide clinicians and systematic reviewers. Search strategy: We searched public sources and lodged Freedom of Information requests for previously confidential CSRs primarily written by industry for regulators. Selection criteria: CSR reporting sufficient information for extraction (“adequate”). Primary outcome measures: Presence and length of essential elements of trial design and reporting and compression factor (ratio of page length for CSR compared to its published counterpart in a scientific journal). Data extraction: data were extracted on standard forms and cross-checked for accuracy. Results: We assembled a population of 78 CSRs (covering 90 RCTs; 144,610 pages total) dated 1991-2011 of 14 pharmaceuticals. Report synopses had a median length of 5 pages, efficacy evaluation 13.5 pages, safety evaluation 17 pages, attached tables 337 pages, trial protocol 62 pages, statistical analysis plan 15 pages, and individual efficacy and safety listings had a median length of 447 and 109.5 pages, respectively. While 16 (21%) of CSRs contained completed case report forms, these were accessible to us in only one case (765 pages representing 16 individuals). Compression factors ranged between 1 and 8805. Conclusions: Clinical study reports represent a hitherto mostly hidden and untapped source of detailed and exhaustive data on each trial. They should be consulted by independent parties interested in a detailed record of a clinical trial, and should form the basic unit for evidence synthesis as their use is likely to minimize the problem of reporting bias. We cannot say whether our sample is representative and whether our conclusions are generalizable to an undefined and undefineable population of CSRs.
ID:
oai:datadryad.org:10255/dryad.46784
ID:
doi:10.5061/dryad.331f7
Doshi P, Jefferson T (2013) Clinical study reports of randomised controlled trials: an exploratory review of previously confidential industry reports. BMJ Open 3(2): e002496.
http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.46784
bmjOpen-bmjopen-2012-002496.R1
setID:
hdl_10255_3
recNum:
17
setName:
Main
dateReleased:
03-11-2013
issueDate:
20130226
accessionDate:
02-19-2013
dateCreated:
02-19-2013
abbreviation:
Dryad
ID:
SCR:005910
name:
Dryad Digital Repository
homepage: http://www.datadryad.org
ID:
SCR:005910
name:
Dryad Data Repository

Feedback?

If you are having problems using our tools, or if you would just like to send us some feedback, please post your questions on GitHub.